Alexander Nagel
- History top 1%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 2%
- Archeology top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christopher S. WoodAby WarburgLeonard BarkanGeorges Didi‐HubermanDavid JoselitChristopher WoodAlessandra RussoDavid Franklin
- Topics
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (9 papers)Architecture and Art History Studies (6 papers)Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungaryPortugal
In The Last Decade
Alexander Nagel
22 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- History 106
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 65
- Archeology 60
- Anthropology 42
- Classics 36
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Nagel
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Nagel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Nagel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Nagel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Nagel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Nagel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Nagel. The network helps show where Alexander Nagel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Nagel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Nagel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Nagel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Nagel. Alexander Nagel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Colors, Gilding and Painted Motifs in Persepolis: Approaching the Polychromy of Achaemenid Persian Architectural Sculpture, c. 520-330 BCE. | 7 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | The Authors Reply: Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood | 1 |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Michelangelo, Raphael and the altarpiece tradition | 2 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Alexander Nagel
Alexander Nagel is a scholar working on Conservation, Space and Planetary Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 27 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (9 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (6 papers) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (65 citations), History (106 citations) and Classics (36 citations). Alexander Nagel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Christopher S. Wood, Aby Warburg, Leonard Barkan, Georges Didi‐Huberman, David Joselit, Christopher Wood, Alessandra Russo, David Franklin, Katherine Eremin and David Alan Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Heritage Science, The Art Bulletin and October.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.