Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life
19771.8k citationsAlexander J. Field et al.The Journal of Human Resourcesprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Alexander J. Field Alexander J. Field (= 1×)
peers
Samuel Bowles
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander J. Field
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander J. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander J. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander J. Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander J. Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander J. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander J. Field. The network helps show where Alexander J. Field may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander J. Field
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander J. Field.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander J. Field based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander J. Field. Alexander J. Field is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Field, Alexander J.. (2008). The Impact of the Second World War on U.S. Productivity Growth. Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University).2 indexed citations
5.
Field, Alexander J.. (2008). The Relative Productivity of American Distribution, 1869-1992. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
6.
Field, Alexander J.. (2008). Beyond Foraging: Evolutionary Theory, Institutional Variation, and Economic Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Field, Alexander J.. (2003). Comment on Bergstrom. Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University).3 indexed citations
10.
Field, Alexander J.. (2001). Not What it Used to Be: The Cambridge Economic History of The United States, vols. II and III. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
11.
Field, Alexander J.. (1998). The Telegraphic Transmission of Financial Asset Prices and Orders to Trade: Implications for Economic Growth, Trading Volume, and Securities Market Regulation. Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University).10 indexed citations
12.
Field, Alexander J.. (1995). The future of economics.1 indexed citations
Huberman, Michael & Alexander J. Field. (1988). The Future of Economic History. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique. 21(3). 672–672.6 indexed citations
15.
Field, Alexander J.. (1984). Asset Exchanges and the Transactions Demand for Money, 1919-1929. American Economic Review. 74(1). 43–59.3 indexed citations
16.
Field, Alexander J.. (1980). The Relative Stability of German and American Industrial Growth, 1880-1913: A Comparative Analysis. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 11. 208–233.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.