Alexander C. Walker

43 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Alexander C. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Decision Sciences 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
  • Applied Psychology 23
  • Literature and Literary Theory 42
  • Communication 25
Replace Eddy Van Avermaet with:
Eddy Van Avermaet Belgium
Laurence J. Severance United States
Amanda D. Angie United States
Josef Nerb Germany
Thomas J. Flamson United States
Marjolein Maas Netherlands
Evert A. van Doorn Netherlands
Marc–Lluís Vives United States
Xiaowen Xu Canada
Beth A. Pontari United States
Alexander C. Walker relative to Eddy Van Avermaet Belgium Eddy Van Avermaet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eddy Van Avermaet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander C. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander C. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander C. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander C. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander C. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander C. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander C. Walker. The network helps show where Alexander C. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Alexander C. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander C. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Alexander C. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201933
2 202125
3 197123
4 201920
5 201919
6
Stardom;: The Hollywood phenomenon
197015
7 201814
8 202114
9 202114
10 202013
11
Hollywood England: The British Film Industry in the Sixties
197412
12 201912
13 201711
14 201511
15 202210
16 202110
17 202010
18 20219
19
Stanley Kubrick Directs
19729
20 19859

About Alexander C. Walker

Alexander C. Walker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (6 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (42 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations), Applied Psychology (23 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations) and Communication (25 citations). Alexander C. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Martin Harry Turpin, Derek J. Koehler, Jennifer A. Stolz, Michał Białek, Mike J. Dixon, Madison Stange, Ethan Andrew Meyers, Richard Griffith and Igor Grossmann. Their work appears in journals such as Judgment and Decision Making, Journal of Gambling Studies, Cognition, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Evolutionary Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact