Michał Białek

2.9k total citations
64 papers, 866 citations indexed

About

Michał Białek is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michał Białek has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 866 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in General Decision Sciences and 21 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michał Białek's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (35 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (23 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (14 papers). Michał Białek is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (35 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (23 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (14 papers). Michał Białek collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Canada and United Kingdom. Michał Białek's co-authors include Gordon Pennycook, Wim De Neys, Paweł Niszczota, Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Rafał Muda, Bertram Gawronski, Piotr Sorokowski, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Paul Conway and Marta Kowal and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Michał Białek

58 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michał Białek Poland	15	479	329	326	158	115	64	866
Onurcan Yılmaz Türkiye	20	527 1.1×	501 1.5×	716 2.2×	55 0.3×	70 0.6×	61	1.2k
Rasyid Bo Sanitioso France	14	246 0.5×	306 0.9×	464 1.4×	92 0.6×	36 0.3×	31	932
Andrew E. Monroe United States	14	856 1.8×	542 1.6×	560 1.7×	61 0.4×	128 1.1×	25	1.3k
Monique Pollmann Netherlands	13	191 0.4×	272 0.8×	346 1.1×	76 0.5×	25 0.2×	29	773
Kevin Tobia United States	12	472 1.0×	222 0.7×	253 0.8×	34 0.2×	90 0.8×	52	832
Michael J. Gill United States	13	220 0.5×	352 1.1×	403 1.2×	146 0.9×	18 0.2×	27	896
Philip Pärnamets Sweden	13	313 0.7×	171 0.5×	561 1.7×	83 0.5×	21 0.2×	28	1.1k
Steve Guglielmo United States	11	624 1.3×	418 1.3×	420 1.3×	28 0.2×	141 1.2×	17	926
Teresa L. Davis United States	15	216 0.5×	244 0.7×	228 0.7×	49 0.3×	49 0.4×	19	719
Suzanne J. LaFleur United States	7	208 0.4×	263 0.8×	361 1.1×	219 1.4×	23 0.2×	8	881

Countries citing papers authored by Michał Białek

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michał Białek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michał Białek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michał Białek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michał Białek

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michał Białek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michał Białek. The network helps show where Michał Białek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michał Białek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michał Białek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michał Białek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michał Białek. Michał Białek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Białek, Michał, et al.. (2024). Moral-dilemma judgments by individuals and groups: Are many heads really more utilitarian than one?. Cognition. 256. 106053–106053.

Muda, Rafał, et al.. (2024). No foreign language effect in self-sacrificial moral dilemmas. International Journal of Bilingualism. 30(1). 94–109. 2 indexed citations

Borkowska, Anna, et al.. (2023). Using a foreign language does not make you think more: Null effects of using a foreign language on cognitive reflection and numeracy. International Journal of Bilingualism. 28(5). 1002–1015. 5 indexed citations

Białek, Michał, et al.. (2023). COVID-19 vaccine skeptics are persuaded by pro-vaccine expert consensus messaging.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 29(3). 477–488. 4 indexed citations

Muda, Rafał, et al.. (2023). People are worse at detecting fake news in their foreign language.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 29(4). 712–724. 8 indexed citations

Białek, Michał, Michał Misiak, & Martyna Dziekan. (2023). The vicious cycle that stalls statistical revolution. Nature Human Behaviour. 7(2). 161–163. 2 indexed citations

Niszczota, Paweł, Paul Conway, & Michał Białek. (2023). Unethical Investments: The Baseline Propensity to Invest and the Susceptibility to Moral Decay. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Białek, Michał, et al.. (2022). Conflict detection predicts the temporal stability of intuitive and deliberate reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning. 29(4). 427–455. 5 indexed citations

Białek, Michał, et al.. (2021). Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 5–16. 1 indexed citations

10.

Białek, Michał, et al.. (2021). Your health vs. my liberty: Philosophical beliefs dominated reflection and identifiable victim effects when predicting public health recommendation compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cognition. 212. 104649–104649. 25 indexed citations

11.

Muda, Rafał, et al.. (2020). Foreign Language does not Affect Gambling-Related Judgments. Journal of Gambling Studies. 36(2). 633–652. 12 indexed citations

12.

Turpin, Martin Harry, Ethan Andrew Meyers, Alexander C. Walker, et al.. (2020). The environmental malleability of base-rate neglect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 27(2). 385–391. 8 indexed citations

13.

Meyers, Ethan Andrew, Michał Białek, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler, & Ori Friedman. (2019). Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making. 14(6). 721–727. 2 indexed citations

14.

Białek, Michał, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, & Ori Friedman. (2018). Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making. 13(5). 451–457. 5 indexed citations

15.

Białek, Michał. (2017). Not that neglected! Base rates influence related and unrelated judgments. Acta Psychologica. 177. 10–16. 5 indexed citations

16.

Białek, Michał & Wim De Neys. (2017). Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity. Judgment and Decision Making. 12(2). 148–167. 61 indexed citations

17.

Białek, Michał & Wim De Neys. (2016). Conflict detection during moral decision-making: evidence for deontic reasoners’ utilitarian sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 28(5). 631–639. 40 indexed citations

18.

Białek, Michał. (2016). What Color are the Lilies? Forced Reflection Boosts Performance in the Cognitive Reflection Test.. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

19.

Domurat, Artur & Michał Białek. (2016). Dowodzenie hipotez za pomocą czynnika bayesowskiego (bayes factor): przykłady użycia w badaniach empirycznych. 109–142. 6 indexed citations

20.

Białek, Michał. (2010). Związek cech analizowanych treści z pojawiającymi się błędami rozumowania. 4. 41–48. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact