Alcuin Blamires
- Classics top 1%
- Medieval Literature and History 13
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1
- History top 2%
- Historical Studies of British Isles 3
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- Historical and Archaeological Studies 1
- Religious studies top 5%
- Early Modern Women Writers 1
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- C. W. MarxMarion Wynne-DaviesLesley SmithJoan M. FerranteDavid AersJulia BoffeyDieter MehlAndrew Galloway
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (1 paper)Viator (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alcuin Blamires
9 papers receiving 67 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Classics 109
- History 77
- Religious studies 21
- Literature and Literary Theory 37
- Language and Linguistics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Alcuin Blamires
This map shows the geographic impact of Alcuin Blamires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alcuin Blamires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alcuin Blamires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alcuin Blamires
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alcuin Blamires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alcuin Blamires. The network helps show where Alcuin Blamires may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Alcuin Blamires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 6 | Karma Lochrie. — Covert Operations : The Medieval Uses of Secrecy. Philadelphie, University of Pennsylvania Pr., 1999 (Middle Age Series) | 2002 | 1 |
| 7 | 2000 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 36 | |
| 12 | Questions of Gender in Chaucer, from Anelida to Troilus | 1994 | 2 |
| 13 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 14 | Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts ; The Medieval Review | 1992 | 1 |
| 15 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 16 | Chaucer's Revaluation of Chivalric Honor | 1979 | 4 |
About Alcuin Blamires
Alcuin Blamires is a scholar working on Classics, History and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 16 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (1 paper), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (109 citations), History (77 citations) and Religious studies (21 citations). Alcuin Blamires has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. W. Marx, Marion Wynne-Davies, Lesley Smith, Joan M. Ferrante, David Aers, Julia Boffey, Dieter Mehl, Andrew Galloway, Jamie C. Fumo and A. S. G. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature and Viator.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.