C. W. Marx
- Classics top 2%
- History top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Sociology and Political Science
- Language and Linguistics
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (9 papers)Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
C. W. Marx
11 papers receiving 56 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Classics 76
- History 59
- Literature and Literary Theory 20
- Sociology and Political Science 14
- Language and Linguistics 14
Countries citing papers authored by C. W. Marx
This map shows the geographic impact of C. W. Marx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. W. Marx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. W. Marx more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. W. Marx
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. W. Marx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. W. Marx. The network helps show where C. W. Marx may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. W. Marx
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. W. Marx. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. W. Marx based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. W. Marx. C. W. Marx is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | An English chronicle, 1377-1461 : edited from Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales MS 21068 and Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Lyell 34 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | An Abbreviated Middle English Prose translation of the Elucidarius: 615 | 0 |
| 6 | Manuscripts in the National Library of Wales (Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru), Aberystwyth | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | The devils' parl[i]ament ; and, The harrowing of hell and destruction of Jerusalem | 0 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Middle English manuscripts of the Brut in the National Library of Wales | 1 |
| 15 | Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts ; The Medieval Review | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | The Middle English Prose Complaint of Our Lady and Gospel of Nicodemus | 2 |
| 18 | 1 |
About C. W. Marx
C. W. Marx is a scholar working on Classics, History and Religious studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (76 citations), History (59 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). C. W. Marx has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lister M. Matheson, Alcuin Blamires, Marion Wynne-Davies, Ronald Waldron and Irma Taavitsainen. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries and Neophilologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.