C. W. Marx

665 citations
18 papers · 107 indexed · h-index 4

C. W. Marx

11 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers

C. W. Marx
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Classics 76
  • History 59
  • Literature and Literary Theory 20
  • Religious studies 7
  • Language and Linguistics 14
Replace Lister M. Matheson with:
Lister M. Matheson United States
Ruth Evans United States
Wendy Scase United Kingdom
Phillipa Hardman United Kingdom
Fiona Somerset United States
A. V. C. Schmidt Colombia
Jonathan Gibson United Kingdom
Felicity Riddy United Kingdom
Jo Ann Hoeppner Moran United Kingdom
Theodore J. Cachey United Kingdom
C. W. Marx relative to Lister M. Matheson United States Lister M. Matheson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lister M. Matheson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. W. Marx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. W. Marx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. W. Marx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. W. Marx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. W. Marx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. W. Marx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. W. Marx. The network helps show where C. W. Marx may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 5 scholars most cited alongside C. W. Marx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. W. Marx Line = papers co-authored together C. W. Marx links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20200
2
An English chronicle, 1377-1461 : edited from Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales MS 21068 and Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Lyell 34
20031
3 20011
4 200127
5
An Abbreviated Middle English Prose translation of the Elucidarius: 615
20000
6
Manuscripts in the National Library of Wales (Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru), Aberystwyth
19991
7 19990
8 199714
9 199616
10 199436
11 19941
12
The devils' parl[i]ament ; and, The harrowing of hell and destruction of Jerusalem
19930
13 19933
14
Middle English manuscripts of the Brut in the National Library of Wales
19921
15
Woman Defamed and Woman Defended: An Anthology of Medieval Texts ; The Medieval Review
19921
16 19872
17
The Middle English Prose Complaint of Our Lady and Gospel of Nicodemus
19872
18 19801

About C. W. Marx

C. W. Marx is a scholar working on Classics, History and Religious studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Health and Medical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (76 citations), History (59 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations). C. W. Marx has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lister M. Matheson, Alcuin Blamires, Marion Wynne-Davies, Ronald Waldron and Irma Taavitsainen. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries, Neophilologus, The Library and Pflegezeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026