Michael Della Rocca
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Don GarrettAlan DonaganAlan GabbeyEdwin CurleyPierre‐François MoreauJonathan BennettMargaret D. WilsonWim Klever
- Topics
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy (12 papers)Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (12 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Della Rocca
26 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Philosophy 382
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- History and Philosophy of Science 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
- Political Science and International Relations 44
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Della Rocca
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Della Rocca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Della Rocca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Della Rocca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Della Rocca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Della Rocca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Della Rocca. The network helps show where Michael Della Rocca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Della Rocca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Della Rocca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Della Rocca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Della Rocca. Michael Della Rocca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Adventures in Rationalism | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 113 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Michael Della Rocca
Michael Della Rocca is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (12 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (12 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (382 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (132 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations). Michael Della Rocca has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Don Garrett, Alan Donagan, Alan Gabbey, Edwin Curley, Pierre‐François Moreau, Jonathan Bennett, Don Garrett, Margaret D. Wilson, Wim Klever and Richard H. Popkin. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.