Don Garrett
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- John WrightEdwin CurleyMichael Della RoccaMargaret D. WilsonJonathan BennettDon GarrettAlan DonaganAlan Gabbey
- Topics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (27 papers)Medieval and Classical Philosophy (17 papers)Political Theology and Sovereignty (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Don Garrett
45 papers receiving 539 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 569
- History and Philosophy of Science 187
- Political Science and International Relations 180
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Sociology and Political Science 121
Countries citing papers authored by Don Garrett
This map shows the geographic impact of Don Garrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Garrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Garrett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Don Garrett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Garrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Garrett. The network helps show where Don Garrett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Don Garrett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Don Garrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Don Garrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Don Garrett. Don Garrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | Nature and Necessity in Spinoza's Philosophy | 2 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | The empiricists : critical essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume | 5 |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 113 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Don Garrett
Don Garrett is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and General Social Sciences, having authored 55 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (27 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (17 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (569 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (187 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations). Don Garrett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Wright, Edwin Curley, Michael Della Rocca, Margaret D. Wilson, Jonathan Bennett, Don Garrett, Alan Donagan, Alan Gabbey, Pierre‐François Moreau and Wim Klever. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.