Aimée Hoeve

402 total citations
13 papers, 199 citations indexed

About

Aimée Hoeve is a scholar working on Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Aimée Hoeve has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 199 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 4 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Aimée Hoeve's work include Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (2 papers). Aimée Hoeve is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (2 papers). Aimée Hoeve collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Aimée Hoeve's co-authors include Loek Nieuwenhuis, Ilya Zitter, Elly de Bruijn, Femke Geijsel, Maarten de Laat, A.W.M. Smeulders, Jan J. Gerbrands, A.M. Vossepoel, Marcel Worring and Kathleen F. Mittendorf and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Workplace Learning and European Educational Research Journal.

In The Last Decade

Aimée Hoeve

12 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Aimée Hoeve

EDUCA

HFE

OBHRM

MTI

SM

Juha Pihlaja Finland

Jake M. Laguador Philippines

Kelefa Mwantimwa Tanzania

Vasiliki Brinia Greece

G.M. Benscoter

Lukman Hakim Indonesia

Mulyadi Mulyadi Indonesia

Marc Egloffstein Germany

Mohd Safarin Nordin Malaysia

Shaheryar Naveed Pakistan

Juha Pihlaja Finland

Aimée Hoeve

90 ×1.3

EDUCA

144 ×2.5

HFE

36 ×1.1

OBHRM

21 ×0.7

MTI

6 ×0.2

SM

Citations per year, relative to Aimée Hoeve Aimée Hoeve (= 1×) peers Juha Pihlaja

Countries citing papers authored by Aimée Hoeve

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aimée Hoeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimée Hoeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimée Hoeve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aimée Hoeve

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimée Hoeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimée Hoeve. The network helps show where Aimée Hoeve may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aimée Hoeve

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aimée Hoeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aimée Hoeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aimée Hoeve. Aimée Hoeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2017). A routine perspective on implementing reflective career conversations in education. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 45(2). 178–187. 8 indexed citations

2.

Nieuwenhuis, Loek, et al.. (2017). Pedagogisch-didactische vormgeving van werkplekleren in het initieel beroepsonderwijs: een internationale reviewstudie.. DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands). 1 indexed citations

3.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2016). Van losse ingrediënten naar smakelijk gerecht. 1 indexed citations

4.

Zitter, Ilya, Aimée Hoeve, & Elly de Bruijn. (2016). A Design Perspective on the School-Work Boundary: A Hybrid Curriculum Model. Vocations and Learning. 9(1). 111–131. 35 indexed citations

5.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2014). Interactive Research on Innovations in Vocational Education and Training (VET): Lessons from Dutch and German cases. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(2). 143–160. 6 indexed citations

6.

Zitter, Ilya & Aimée Hoeve. (2012). Hybrid Learning Environments: Merging Learning and Work Processes to Facilitate Knowledge Integration and Transitions. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 81.. 10 indexed citations

7.

Zitter, Ilya, et al.. (2012). Ontwikkelmodel voor hybride leeromgevingen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 54–69.

8.

Geijsel, Femke, et al.. (2006). Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning. Journal of Workplace Learning. 18(5). 298–312. 47 indexed citations

9.

Hoeve, Aimée & Loek Nieuwenhuis. (2006). Learning routines in innovation processes. Journal of Workplace Learning. 18(3). 171–185. 36 indexed citations

10.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2003). Learning entrepreneurs as experts. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 9(3). 103–116. 6 indexed citations

11.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2003). The interface between learning and innovation: building a conceptual model. University of Twente Research Information. 60–69. 2 indexed citations

12.

Hoeve, Aimée, et al.. (2003). Learning Entrepreneurs: Learning and Innovation in Small Companies. European Educational Research Journal. 2(1). 90–106. 42 indexed citations

13.

Worring, Marcel, A.W.M. Smeulders, Jan J. Gerbrands, et al.. (1996). Digital curvature estimation. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 165–182. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact