Aileen McIntosh

686 citations
15 papers · 543 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Aileen McIntosh

14 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Aileen McIntosh
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 78
  • Pharmacology 197
  • Health Information Management 51
  • Family Practice 18
  • General Health Professions 204
Replace G Harding with:
G Harding United Kingdom
Eliane Ribeiro Brazil
Clare Bayram Australia
Surrey M. Walton United States
Tim Noblet United Kingdom
Valentina Lichtner United Kingdom
Robin S. Mickelson United States
Lílian Varanda Pereira Brazil
Kathleen White United States
Lotte Verweij Netherlands
Aileen McIntosh relative to G Harding United Kingdom G Harding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
G Harding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aileen McIntosh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aileen McIntosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aileen McIntosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aileen McIntosh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aileen McIntosh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aileen McIntosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aileen McIntosh. The network helps show where Aileen McIntosh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aileen McIntosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aileen McIntosh Line = papers co-authored together Aileen McIntosh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201313
2 201025
3 200841
4 200779
5 200618
6 2003109
7
Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.
200321
8
Managing care in the community for patients with type 2 diabetes.
20031
9 200125
10 20017
11 20010
12 1998157
13 19967
14 19968
15
Informal learning in the professions
199432

About Aileen McIntosh

Aileen McIntosh is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Pharmacy, Emergency Medical Services, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (78 citations), Pharmacology (197 citations), Health Information Management (51 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and General Health Professions (204 citations). Aileen McIntosh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Allen Hutchinson, Gordon Waddell, Gene Feder, Geoffrey Squires, Julie Ratcliffe, Peter A. Bath, Joanne Lymn, Louise Guillaume, Sue Read and Paul Bissell. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, BMJ Quality & Safety, Health Technology Assessment, Health Expectations and Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026