John Cape

3.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
60 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

John Cape is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Cape has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Clinical Psychology, 19 papers in General Health Professions and 16 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John Cape's work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (15 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers). John Cape is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Treatment and Access (15 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers). John Cape collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. John Cape's co-authors include Colin A. Espie, Simon D. Kyle, Marta Buszewicz, Peter Hames, Maria Gardani, Leanne Fleming, Craig Whittington, Stephen Pilling, Judy Leibowitz and Paul K. Wallace and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

John Cape

58 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

The Sleep Condition Indicator: a clinical screening tool ... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 2018 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Cape United Kingdom 25 848 704 687 577 410 60 2.2k
Bradley E. Karlin United States 28 627 0.7× 858 1.2× 1.6k 2.3× 658 1.1× 293 0.7× 57 2.8k
Lela R. McKnight-Eily United States 25 650 0.8× 1.0k 1.4× 1.0k 1.5× 574 1.0× 278 0.7× 42 3.2k
Marc Serfaty United Kingdom 22 308 0.4× 294 0.4× 879 1.3× 596 1.0× 233 0.6× 68 1.9k
Bea Tiemens Netherlands 22 492 0.6× 722 1.0× 741 1.1× 983 1.7× 215 0.5× 100 2.3k
Ottar Bjerkeset Norway 28 403 0.5× 493 0.7× 927 1.3× 532 0.9× 187 0.5× 91 2.7k
H. Katschnig Austria 24 731 0.9× 372 0.5× 920 1.3× 537 0.9× 283 0.7× 87 2.2k
Ulrike Maske Germany 18 452 0.5× 708 1.0× 809 1.2× 652 1.1× 115 0.3× 24 2.1k
Michel Préville Canada 30 763 0.9× 813 1.2× 1.0k 1.5× 648 1.1× 352 0.9× 114 3.3k
Shay‐Lee Belik Canada 21 503 0.6× 535 0.8× 1.8k 2.6× 801 1.4× 160 0.4× 24 2.9k
Daniel Lewin United States 23 1.6k 1.9× 972 1.4× 627 0.9× 245 0.4× 894 2.2× 53 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by John Cape

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Cape's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cape with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cape more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Cape

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cape. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cape. The network helps show where John Cape may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Cape

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Cape. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Cape based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Cape. John Cape is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Saunders, Rob, Ying Liu, Ciarán O’Driscoll, et al.. (2023). Examining bi-directional change in sleep and depression symptoms in individuals receiving routine psychological treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 163. 1–8. 6 indexed citations
2.
Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, Judy Leibowitz, John Cape, & Stephen Pilling. (2021). Trends in depression & anxiety symptom severity among mental health service attendees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders. 289. 105–109. 14 indexed citations
3.
Fonagy, Peter, Alessandra Lemma, Mary Target, et al.. (2019). Dynamic interpersonal therapy for moderate to severe depression: a pilot randomized controlled and feasibility trial. Psychological Medicine. 50(6). 1010–1019. 23 indexed citations
5.
Saunders, Rob, Joshua E. J. Buckman, John Cape, et al.. (2019). Trajectories of depression and anxiety symptom change during psychological therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders. 249. 327–335. 55 indexed citations
6.
Espie, Colin A., Jenna R. Carl, Simon D. Kyle, et al.. (2017). The Sleep Condition Indicator: reference values derived from a sample of 200 000 adults. Journal of Sleep Research. 27(3). e12643–e12643. 52 indexed citations
8.
Richards, David, Linda Gask, Karina Lovell, et al.. (2013). Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 347(aug19 1). f4913–f4913. 150 indexed citations
9.
Espie, Colin A., et al.. (2013). The Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI): a practical clinical screening tool to evaluate DSM-5 insomnia disorder. SLEEP. 36(1). 650–678. 2 indexed citations
10.
Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia, Nick Meader, John Cape, & Tim Kendall. (2013). The Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Generalized Anxiety Disorder. PharmacoEconomics. 31(4). 317–333. 11 indexed citations
11.
Richards, David, Peter Bower, Christina Pagel, et al.. (2012). Delivering stepped care: an analysis of implementation in routine practice. Implementation Science. 7(1). 3–3. 110 indexed citations
12.
Fonagy, Peter, Graham Turpin, Melanie A. Adams, et al.. (2009). Speaking up for IAPT. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
13.
Stavrou, Stavros, John Cape, & Chris Barker. (2009). Decisions about referrals for psychological therapies: a matched-patient qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 59(566). e289–e298. 16 indexed citations
14.
Richards, David, Adwoa Hughes-Morley, Rachel Hayes, et al.. (2009). Collaborative Depression Trial (CADET): multi-centre randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for depression - study protocol. BMC Health Services Research. 9(1). 188–188. 30 indexed citations
15.
Paxton, Roger & John Cape. (2008). Doncaster: What we still need to know and what we can learn from it. Clinical Psychology Forum. 1(181). 38–40. 1 indexed citations
16.
Buszewicz, Marta, et al.. (2005). A graduate primary care mental health worker pilot study: Facilitating access to voluntary and community sector services. A description of the 'Community Link Service'. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
17.
Cape, John, et al.. (2003). Identification of psychological morbidity in older people in primary care by practice nurses. Aging & Mental Health. 7(6). 446–451. 4 indexed citations
18.
Cape, John & Michael Barkham. (2002). Practice improvement methods: Conceptual base, evidence‐based research, and practice‐based recommendations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 41(3). 285–307. 18 indexed citations
19.
Cape, John, et al.. (1998). Relationship between practice counselling and referral to outpatient psychiatry and clinical psychology.. PubMed. 48(433). 1477–80. 9 indexed citations
20.
Kelson, Marcia, et al.. (1996). Involving patients and users of services in quality improvement: what are the benefits?. 1(2). 63–67. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026