Peter Pratt
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 2
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
- Epilepsy research and treatment 1
- Co-authors
- M. S. Lennard (3 shared papers)Simon Davies (2 shared papers)Rhodri Huws (1 shared paper)John Geddes (1 shared paper)Sue Johnston (1 shared paper)Stephen P. Pereira (1 shared paper)Aki Tsuchiya (1 shared paper)William Bingley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nutrients (1 paper)Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (1 paper)British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1 paper)Safety Science (1 paper)Journal of Psychopharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Pratt
7 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 41
- Sensory Systems 36
- Clinical Psychology 103
- Emergency Medical Services 24
- Pharmacology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Pratt
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Pratt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Pratt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Pratt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Pratt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Pratt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Pratt. The network helps show where Peter Pratt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Pratt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Peter Pratt
Peter Pratt is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health Information Management, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (41 citations), Sensory Systems (36 citations), Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Emergency Medical Services (24 citations) and Pharmacology (22 citations). Peter Pratt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. S. Lennard, Simon Davies, Rhodri Huws, John Geddes, Sue Johnston, Stephen P. Pereira, Aki Tsuchiya, William Bingley, Kevin Gournay and Andrea Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Safety Science and Journal of Psychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.