Afrodita Marcu

1.6k total citations
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Afrodita Marcu is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Afrodita Marcu has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Oncology, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Afrodita Marcu's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers). Afrodita Marcu is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers). Afrodita Marcu collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Norway. Afrodita Marcu's co-authors include Julie Barnett, Wim Verbeke, Beate Seibt, Rui Gaspar, Pieter Rutsaert, Dave Fletcher, Emma Ream, Grace Lucas, Roma Maguire and Freda Mold and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Afrodita Marcu

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Afrodita Marcu United Kingdom 16 305 299 247 223 223 39 1.2k
Piia Jallinoja Finland 21 184 0.6× 208 0.7× 406 1.6× 46 0.2× 165 0.7× 66 1.4k
Cristina Godinho Portugal 18 332 1.1× 312 1.0× 335 1.4× 16 0.1× 112 0.5× 78 1.3k
Hang Lu United States 24 76 0.2× 123 0.4× 101 0.4× 40 0.2× 452 2.0× 95 2.5k
Linnea Laestadius United States 21 246 0.8× 212 0.7× 179 0.7× 11 0.0× 530 2.4× 60 1.7k
Reint Jan Renes Netherlands 19 92 0.3× 468 1.6× 348 1.4× 7 0.0× 260 1.2× 69 1.9k
Erin Biehl United States 11 174 0.6× 227 0.8× 132 0.5× 11 0.0× 59 0.3× 18 866
Gun Roos Norway 23 129 0.4× 222 0.7× 646 2.6× 10 0.0× 121 0.5× 53 1.3k
Sophie Attwood United Kingdom 12 107 0.4× 126 0.4× 213 0.9× 14 0.1× 55 0.2× 22 758
Margaret Connors United States 11 120 0.4× 682 2.3× 857 3.5× 9 0.0× 373 1.7× 16 2.2k
Gil‐Soo Han Australia 20 38 0.1× 130 0.4× 280 1.1× 42 0.2× 308 1.4× 129 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Afrodita Marcu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Afrodita Marcu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Afrodita Marcu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Afrodita Marcu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Afrodita Marcu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Afrodita Marcu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Afrodita Marcu. The network helps show where Afrodita Marcu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Afrodita Marcu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Afrodita Marcu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Afrodita Marcu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Afrodita Marcu. Afrodita Marcu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marcu, Afrodita, Emma Ream, Karen Poole, et al.. (2025). Symptom appraisal and help- seeking before a cancer diagnosis during pregnancy: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice. 75(754). e341–e348.
3.
Marcu, Afrodita, et al.. (2024). Socioeconomic inequities in care experienced by women with breast cancer in England: An intersectional cross-sectional study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 72. 102648–102648. 5 indexed citations
5.
Whitaker, Katriina L., Anna Cox, Abhijit Pal, et al.. (2024). Integrating Implementation Theory to Address Inequities in Cancer Care: Perspectives from an International Working Group. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2024(1). 1 indexed citations
6.
Harris, Jenny, Emma Ream, Jo Armes, et al.. (2023). What do we know about the psychosocial issues associated with cancer during pregnancy? A scoping review and gap analysis. BMJ Open. 13(3). e063283–e063283. 4 indexed citations
7.
Marcu, Afrodita, et al.. (2023). Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 13(1). e066637–e066637. 8 indexed citations
9.
Lusignan, Simon de, Andrew McGovern, William Hinton, et al.. (2022). Barriers and Facilitators to the Initiation of Injectable Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mixed Methods Study. Diabetes Therapy. 13(10). 1789–1809. 8 indexed citations
10.
Ream, Emma, Alison Richardson, Grace Lucas, et al.. (2020). Understanding the support needs of family members of people undergoing chemotherapy: A longitudinal qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 50. 101861–101861. 15 indexed citations
11.
Marcu, Afrodita, et al.. (2018). Online Information-Seeking About Potential Breast Cancer Symptoms: Capturing Online Behavior With an Internet Browsing Tracking Tool. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(2). e12400–e12400. 14 indexed citations
12.
Cox, Anna, Grace Lucas, Afrodita Marcu, et al.. (2017). Cancer Survivors’ Experience With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 19(1). e11–e11. 251 indexed citations
13.
Mowbray, Fiona, Afrodita Marcu, Cristina Godinho, Susan Michie, & Lucy Yardley. (2016). Communicating to increase public uptake of pandemic flu vaccination in the UK: Which messages work?. Vaccine. 34(28). 3268–3274. 14 indexed citations
14.
Marcu, Afrodita, et al.. (2015). Accounting for personal and professional choices for pandemic influenza vaccination amongst English healthcare workers. Vaccine. 33(19). 2267–2272. 26 indexed citations
15.
Marcu, Afrodita, et al.. (2015). Public preferences for vaccination and antiviral medicines under different pandemic flu outbreak scenarios. BMC Public Health. 15(1). 190–190. 19 indexed citations
16.
Verbeke, Wim, Afrodita Marcu, Pieter Rutsaert, et al.. (2014). ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Science. 102. 49–58. 288 indexed citations
17.
Marcu, Afrodita, Julie Barnett, David Uzzell, Konstantina Vasileiou, & Susan O’Çonnell. (2013). Experience of Lyme disease and preferences for precautions: a cross-sectional survey of UK patients. BMC Public Health. 13(1). 481–481. 12 indexed citations
18.
O’Brien, Liz, et al.. (2012). Situating risk in the context of a woodland visit: A case study on Lyme Borreliosis. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 66(4). 14–24. 2 indexed citations
19.
Marcu, Afrodita, David Uzzell, & Julie Barnett. (2011). Making sense of unfamiliar risks in the countryside: The case of Lyme disease. Health & Place. 17(3). 843–850. 26 indexed citations
20.
Marcu, Afrodita & Xenia Chryssochoou. (2005). Exclusion of ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: prejudice against the gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London). 41–56. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026