Grace Lucas

1.0k citations
24 papers · 700 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Oncology top 10%
    • Cancer survivorship and care
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
    • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Papers in

Grace Lucas

23 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Grace Lucas
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Oncology 339
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 275
  • General Health Professions 216
  • Applied Psychology 32
Replace Rachel Mayo with:
Rachel Mayo United States
Nora Sporn United States
Susan Galloway Canada
Janet Helduser United States
Geraldine Talarczyk United States
Elizabeth A. Fradgley Australia
Elaine C. Thiel Canada
Eunice S. King United States
Olinda Santin United Kingdom
Betsy S. Vourlekis United States
Grace Lucas relative to Rachel Mayo United States Rachel Mayo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Rachel Mayo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Lucas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Lucas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Lucas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Lucas. The network helps show where Grace Lucas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace Lucas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace Lucas Line = papers co-authored together Grace Lucas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017251
2 2014131
3 201657
4 201547
5 201528
6 201926
7 201826
8 201922
9 201619
10 202015
11 202013
12 202113
13 201712
14 20189
15 20189
16 20186
17 20194
18 20223
19 20163
20 20212

About Grace Lucas

Grace Lucas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (339 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (275 citations), General Health Professions (216 citations) and Applied Psychology (32 citations). Grace Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Emma Ream, Afrodita Marcu, Wendy Grosvenor, Marianne Piano, Anna Cox, Roma Maguire, Freda Mold, Ruth H. Jack, Jill Maben and Elizabeth Davies. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Gynecologic Oncology, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact