Jon R. Bond

1.7k citations
52 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jon R. Bond

45 papers receiving 889 citations

Peers

Jon R. Bond
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 891
  • Public Administration 116
  • Strategy and Management 340
  • Law 167
  • Gender Studies 145
Replace Richard Fleisher with:
Richard Fleisher United States
Jeffery A. Jenkins United States
Malcolm E. Jewell United States
Alan Siaroff Canada
Gary Moncrief United States
Roger Davidson United States
Joseph A. Schlesinger United States
Thomas L. Brunell United States
Gregory J. Wawro United States
Norman J. Ornstein United States
Jon R. Bond relative to Richard Fleisher United States Richard Fleisher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Fleisher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon R. Bond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon R. Bond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon R. Bond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon R. Bond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon R. Bond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon R. Bond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon R. Bond. The network helps show where Jon R. Bond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon R. Bond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon R. Bond Line = papers co-authored together Jon R. Bond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20173
3 201528
4
Are Voters Disconnected or Have Reelection Constituencies Realigned in Ways That Might Account for Party Polarization in Congress
20130
5 20136
6 20131
7
Institutional Games and the U.S. Supreme Court
201219
8 20122
9 200938
10 200360
11 200121
12 200062
13 200041
14 199624
15 198817
16 198319
17 198217
18 198213
19 19822
20 19803

About Jon R. Bond

Jon R. Bond is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Strategy and Management, Public Administration and Gender Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (9 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (8 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (7 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (891 citations), Public Administration (116 citations), Strategy and Management (340 citations), Law (167 citations) and Gender Studies (145 citations). Jon R. Bond has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Fleisher, Cary R. Covington, Glen Krutz, Nehemia Geva, B. Dan Wood, Jeffrey Е. Cohen, Mark A. Peterson, Nelson W. Polsby, Jeffery Talbert and Charles A. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Presidential Studies Quarterly, American Journal of Political Science, Political Research Quarterly and Legislative Studies Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026