Thomas M. Holbrook

2.6k total citations
55 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Holbrook is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Holbrook has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 19 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Holbrook's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (40 papers), Social Media and Politics (17 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (15 papers). Thomas M. Holbrook is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (40 papers), Social Media and Politics (17 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (15 papers). Thomas M. Holbrook collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Thomas M. Holbrook's co-authors include Emily Van Dunk, Scott D. McClurg, Kenneth J. Meier, Laura Langer, Charles Barrilleaux, Aaron C. Weinschenk, James C. Garand, Kathleen Dolan, Stephen L. Percy and Robert S. Erikson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Holbrook

53 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas M. Holbrook United States	21	1.4k	713	525	487	353	55	1.8k
Samuel Kernell United States	16	1.9k 1.4×	694 1.0×	795 1.5×	378 0.8×	499 1.4×	49	2.3k
Marianne C. Stewart United States	25	2.2k 1.6×	1.1k 1.6×	574 1.1×	466 1.0×	359 1.0×	78	2.7k
Helmut Norpoth United States	26	2.1k 1.5×	999 1.4×	796 1.5×	508 1.0×	430 1.2×	89	2.6k
Daniel M. Butler United States	20	1.4k 1.0×	909 1.3×	355 0.7×	354 0.7×	376 1.1×	65	2.2k
David Butler Ireland	16	1.9k 1.4×	917 1.3×	383 0.7×	281 0.6×	218 0.6×	60	2.6k
Mary Stegmaier United States	18	1.6k 1.2×	636 0.9×	650 1.2×	209 0.4×	336 1.0×	50	2.0k
Judith Bara United Kingdom	12	2.4k 1.7×	607 0.9×	354 0.7×	275 0.6×	838 2.4×	21	2.7k
Richard Johnston Canada	21	1.4k 1.0×	1.2k 1.7×	204 0.4×	468 1.0×	229 0.6×	73	2.0k
Andrea Volkens Germany	8	2.2k 1.6×	564 0.8×	339 0.6×	259 0.5×	822 2.3×	15	2.6k
Thomas M. Carsey United States	16	1.8k 1.3×	1.0k 1.4×	304 0.6×	641 1.3×	431 1.2×	53	2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Holbrook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Holbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Holbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Holbrook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Holbrook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Holbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Holbrook. The network helps show where Thomas M. Holbrook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Holbrook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Holbrook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Holbrook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Holbrook. Thomas M. Holbrook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Holbrook, Thomas M., et al.. (2023). Objective conditions, political knowledge, and perceptions of electoral competition in U.S. mayoral elections. Social Science Quarterly. 104(6). 1282–1294. 2 indexed citations

2.

Holbrook, Thomas M. & Aaron C. Weinschenk. (2019). Are Perceptions of Local Conditions Rooted in Reality? Evidence From Two Large-Scale Local Surveys. American Politics Research. 48(4). 467–474. 5 indexed citations

3.

Campbell, James E., Helmut Norpoth, Alan I. Abramowitz, et al.. (2017). A Recap of the 2016 Election Forecasts. PS Political Science & Politics. 50(2). 331–338. 22 indexed citations

4.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (2016). Altered States. Oxford University Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations

5.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (2016). Altered States: Changing Populations, Changing Parties, and the Transformation of the American Political Landscape. 4 indexed citations

6.

Holbrook, Thomas M. & Aaron C. Weinschenk. (2013). Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections. Political Research Quarterly. 67(1). 42–55. 44 indexed citations

7.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (2009). Economic Considerations and the 2008 Presidential Election. PS Political Science & Politics. 42(3). 473–478. 12 indexed citations

8.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (2005). A Post-Mortem and Update of the Economic News and Personal Finances Forecasting Model. PS Political Science & Politics. 38(1). 35–36. 3 indexed citations

9.

Holbrook, Thomas M. & Scott D. McClurg. (2005). The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science. 49(4). 689–703. 142 indexed citations

10.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (2004). Good News for Bush? Economic News, Personal Finances, and the 2004 Presidential Election. PS Political Science & Politics. 37(4). 759–761. 13 indexed citations

11.

Holbrook, Thomas M., et al.. (2003). Campaigns, Polls, and the States: Assessing the Accuracy of Statewide Presidential Trial-Heat Polls. Political Research Quarterly. 56(4). 431–431. 2 indexed citations

12.

Holbrook, Thomas M., et al.. (2003). Campaigns, Polls, and the States: Assessing the Accuracy of Statewide Presidential Trial-Heat Polls. Political Research Quarterly. 56(4). 431–439. 10 indexed citations

13.

Holbrook, Thomas M., et al.. (2003). Statewide Trial‐Heat Polls and the 2000 Presidential Election: A Forecast Model^*. Social Science Quarterly. 84(3). 561–573. 8 indexed citations

14.

Barrilleaux, Charles, Thomas M. Holbrook, & Laura Langer. (2002). Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy. American Journal of Political Science. 46(2). 415–415. 161 indexed citations

15.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (1996). Do Campaigns Matter?. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 198 indexed citations

16.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (1994). Campaigns, National Conditions, and U.S. Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science. 38(4). 973–973. 61 indexed citations

17.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (1993). Institutional Strength and Gubernatorial Elections. American Politics Quarterly. 21(3). 261–271. 9 indexed citations

18.

Holbrook, Thomas M., et al.. (1993). The Effects of Leadership Positions on Votes for Incumbents in State Legislative Elections. Political Research Quarterly. 46(4). 897–897. 1 indexed citations

19.

Meier, Kenneth J. & Thomas M. Holbrook. (1992). "I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'Em:" Political Corruption in the American States. The Journal of Politics. 54(1). 135–155. 146 indexed citations

20.

Holbrook, Thomas M.. (1991). Presidential Elections in Space and Time. American Journal of Political Science. 35(1). 91–91. 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact