A. Zenteno

11.8k total citations
18 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

A. Zenteno is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Zenteno has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in A. Zenteno's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers). A. Zenteno is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers). A. Zenteno collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Germany. A. Zenteno's co-authors include A. Rest, G. Strampelli, D. J. James, Jie Song, Lihwai Lin, R. Chris Smith, Jennifer E. Andrews, T. Matheson, Federica Bianco and Nathan Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

A. Zenteno

15 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Zenteno United States 9 367 108 89 21 13 18 388
Josephine Kerutt Netherlands 10 366 1.0× 145 1.3× 74 0.8× 20 1.0× 8 0.6× 16 392
M. D. Gladders United States 9 346 0.9× 169 1.6× 67 0.8× 32 1.5× 9 0.7× 20 365
T. Emil Rivera-Thorsen Sweden 13 404 1.1× 143 1.3× 58 0.7× 23 1.1× 17 1.3× 24 427
M. Talia Italy 15 498 1.4× 196 1.8× 65 0.7× 25 1.2× 8 0.6× 29 513
Jongwan Ko South Korea 13 310 0.8× 167 1.5× 48 0.5× 31 1.5× 9 0.7× 46 328
Alyssa B. Drake United Kingdom 11 441 1.2× 173 1.6× 84 0.9× 19 0.9× 8 0.6× 21 456
P.‐A. Duc France 12 521 1.4× 174 1.6× 84 0.9× 15 0.7× 12 0.9× 28 528
O. Streicher Germany 7 329 0.9× 155 1.4× 36 0.4× 43 2.0× 13 1.0× 21 370
Yolanda Jiménez-Teja Brazil 9 283 0.8× 147 1.4× 34 0.4× 31 1.5× 8 0.6× 16 303
S. K. Leslie Germany 14 441 1.2× 163 1.5× 134 1.5× 10 0.5× 14 1.1× 30 462

Countries citing papers authored by A. Zenteno

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Zenteno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Zenteno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Zenteno more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Zenteno

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Zenteno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Zenteno. The network helps show where A. Zenteno may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Zenteno

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Zenteno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Zenteno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Zenteno. A. Zenteno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Vega-Martínez, Cristian A, et al.. (2025). Differences in the physical properties of satellite galaxies within relaxed and disturbed galaxy groups and clusters. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 699. A313–A313.
2.
Carrasco, E. R., et al.. (2024). The effect of dynamical states on galaxy cluster populations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 693. A106–A106. 2 indexed citations
3.
Johnson, Christian I., A. Calamida, I. Ferraro, et al.. (2023). A Wide View of the Galactic Globular Cluster NGC 2808: Red Giant and Horizontal Branch Star Spatial Distributions. The Astronomical Journal. 166(1). 3–3. 1 indexed citations
4.
Zenteno, A., Facundo A. Gómez, D. Hernández-Lang, et al.. (2023). Clash of Titans: the impact of cluster mergers in the galaxy cluster red sequence. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 525(2). 1769–1778. 3 indexed citations
5.
Sheppard, Scott S., D. J. Tholen, Petr Pokorný, et al.. (2022). A Deep and Wide Twilight Survey for Asteroids Interior to Earth and Venus. The Astronomical Journal. 164(4). 168–168. 8 indexed citations
6.
Shields, J., Wolfgang Kerzendorf, Matthew W. Hosek, et al.. (2022). Searching for a Hypervelocity White Dwarf SN Ia Companion: A Proper-motion Survey of SN 1006. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 933(2). L31–L31. 13 indexed citations
7.
Tucker, D. L., S. Allam, Matthew Wiesner, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190814bv: SOAR spectroscopy of 2 DESGW candidates. GRB Coordinates Network. 25379. 1.
8.
Smith, Nathan, A. Rest, Jennifer E. Andrews, et al.. (2018). Exceptionally fast ejecta seen in light echoes of Eta Carinae’s Great Eruption. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(2). 1457–1465. 21 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Nathan, Jennifer E. Andrews, A. Rest, et al.. (2018). Light echoes from the plateau in Eta Carinae’s Great Eruption reveal a two-stage shock-powered event. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(2). 1466–1498. 49 indexed citations
10.
Rest, A., P. Garnavich, Daniel Kasen, et al.. (2018). A fast-evolving luminous transient discovered by K2/Kepler. Nature Astronomy. 2(4). 307–311. 43 indexed citations
11.
Bayliss, Matthew, J. Ruel, B. A. Benson, et al.. (2017). Velocity Segregation and Systematic Biases in Velocity Dispersion Estimates with the SPT-GMOS Spectroscopic Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 837(1). 88–88. 8 indexed citations
12.
Carlsten, Scott G., G. K. T. Hau, & A. Zenteno. (2017). Stellar populations of shell galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 472(3). 2889–2905. 8 indexed citations
13.
Calamida, A., G. Strampelli, A. Rest, et al.. (2017). The Not So Simple Globular Cluster ω Cen. I. Spatial Distribution of the Multiple Stellar Populations. The Astronomical Journal. 153(4). 175–175. 13 indexed citations
14.
Zenteno, A., J. J. Mohr, S. Desai, et al.. (2016). Galaxy populations in the 26 most massive galaxy clusters in the South Pole Telescope SPT-SZ survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 462(1). 830–843. 19 indexed citations
15.
Hlavacek-Larrondo, Julie, M. McDonald, B. A. Benson, et al.. (2015). X-RAY CAVITIES IN A SAMPLE OF 83 SPT-SELECTED CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES: TRACING THE EVOLUTION OF AGN FEEDBACK IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES OUT TOz= 1.2. The Astrophysical Journal. 805(1). 35–35. 90 indexed citations
16.
Gruen, D., F. Brimioulle, S. Seitz, et al.. (2013). Weak lensing analysis of RXC J2248.7−4431. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 432(2). 1455–1467. 27 indexed citations
17.
Desai, S., R. Armstrong, J. J. Mohr, et al.. (2012). THE BLANCO COSMOLOGY SURVEY: DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, CALIBRATION, QUALITY DIAGNOSTICS, AND DATA RELEASE. The Astrophysical Journal. 757(1). 83–83. 77 indexed citations
18.
Buckley‐Geer, E., H. Lin, E. Drabek-Maunder, et al.. (2011). THE SERENDIPITOUS OBSERVATION OF A GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED GALAXY ATz= 0.9057 FROM THE BLANCO COSMOLOGY SURVEY: THE ELLIOT ARC. The Astrophysical Journal. 742(1). 48–48. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026