E. Buckley‐Geer
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- D. L. TuckerS. AllamMax PettiniH. LinKatherine KorneiKevin HainlineAlice E. ShapleyJ. Frieman
- Topics
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers)Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstronomy and Astrophysics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
E. Buckley‐Geer
14 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 318
- Instrumentation 171
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 41
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 34
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 19
Countries citing papers authored by E. Buckley‐Geer
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Buckley‐Geer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Buckley‐Geer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Buckley‐Geer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Buckley‐Geer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Buckley‐Geer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Buckley‐Geer. The network helps show where E. Buckley‐Geer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Buckley‐Geer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Buckley‐Geer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Buckley‐Geer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Buckley‐Geer. E. Buckley‐Geer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 77 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 110 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 3 |
About E. Buckley‐Geer
E. Buckley‐Geer is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (171 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (318 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (41 citations). E. Buckley‐Geer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D. L. Tucker, S. Allam, Max Pettini, H. Lin, Katherine Kornei, Kevin Hainline, Alice E. Shapley, J. Frieman, H. T. Diehl and J. Annis. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.