Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch*
2019491 citationsWendy L. Freedman, Barry F. Madore et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Rachael L. Beaton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachael L. Beaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachael L. Beaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachael L. Beaton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachael L. Beaton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachael L. Beaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachael L. Beaton. The network helps show where Rachael L. Beaton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachael L. Beaton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachael L. Beaton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachael L. Beaton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rachael L. Beaton. Rachael L. Beaton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anand, Gagandeep S., Alejandro Benítez-Llambay, Rachael L. Beaton, et al.. (2025). The First RELHIC? Cloud-9 is a Starless Gas Cloud *. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 993(2). L55–L55.1 indexed citations
Gran, F., M. Zoccali, Á. Rojas-Arriagada, et al.. (2021). APOGEE view of the globular cluster NGC 6544. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 504(3). 3494–3508.6 indexed citations
Freedman, Wendy L., Barry F. Madore, Dylan Hatt, et al.. (2019). The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch*. The Astrophysical Journal. 882(1). 34–34.491 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Beasley, A. J., Sidney C. Wolff, Mark Dickinson, et al.. (2019). Multiwavelength Astrophysics in the Era of the ngVLA and the US ELT Program. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(7). 88.1 indexed citations
Freedman, Wendy L., Rachael L. Beaton, G. Bono, et al.. (2015). CHP-II: The Carnegie Hubble Program to Measure Ho to 3% Using Population II. 13691.5 indexed citations
18.
Beaton, Rachael L., Steven R. Majewski, Richard J. Patterson, et al.. (2013). The SPLASH Survey: Photometric Properties of Sixteen Andromeda dSphs. 221.
19.
Gilbert, Karoline M., Rachael L. Beaton, James S. Bullock, et al.. (2013). The SPLASH Survey: Surface Brightness Profile and Metallicity Gradient of Andromeda's Stellar Halo. AAS. 221.1 indexed citations
20.
Guhathakurta, Puragra, Rachael L. Beaton, James S. Bullock, et al.. (2010). The SPLASH Survey: Spectroscopy of Newly Discovered Tidal Streams in the Outer Halo of the Andromeda Galaxy. 215.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.