Annual Review of Biochemistry

2.5k papers and 749.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 749.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (911 papers), Cell Biology (621 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (128 papers) specifically the topics of Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (451 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (171 papers) and Biotechnology and Related Fields (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Biochemistry are Joan Massagué, Alfred G. Gilman, Roger Y. Tsien, Aaron Ciechanover, Irwin Fridovich, Susan Lindquist, Avram Hershko, Christopher M. Dobson, Fabrizio Chiti and Mariano Barbacid.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Biochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025