The Seventeenth Century

548 papers and 968 indexed citations i.

About

The 548 papers published in The Seventeenth Century in the last decades have received a total of 968 indexed citations. Papers published in The Seventeenth Century usually cover History (274 papers), Political Science and International Relations (134 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (89 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (159 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (88 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Seventeenth Century are Paul Hammond, Noel Malcolm, Stephen Clucas, Peter Lake, Derek Hirst, Martin Dzelzainis, Nicholas McDowell, Eamon Duffy, William Poole and David Norbrook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Seventeenth Century

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Seventeenth Century. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Seventeenth Century.

Countries where authors publish in The Seventeenth Century

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Seventeenth Century. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Seventeenth Century with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Seventeenth Century more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025