This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Landscapes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Landscapes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Landscapes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Landscapes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Landscapes.
About Landscapes
The 253 papers published in Landscapes in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Landscapes usually cover Space and Planetary Science (33 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (38 papers), Archeology (67 papers), Paleontology (45 papers) and History (47 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (45 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (41 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (33 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (25 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (22 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (21 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (17 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Landscapes are Tom Williamson, Graham Fairclough, Andrew Fleming, Richard Tipping, Stephen Rippon, Jonathan Last, Sam Turner, Naomi Sykes, Mark Bowden and Oliver Rackham.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.