Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model
This map shows the geographic impact of William Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Poole more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Poole. The network helps show where William Poole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Poole
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Poole.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Poole based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Poole. William Poole is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Poole, William. (2017). Hayek on the Road to Serfdom. The Journal of private enterprise. 32(1). 11–28.1 indexed citations
Poole, William. (2010). Causes and Consequences of the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009. Harvard journal of law & public policy. 33(2). 421.19 indexed citations
Poole, William & David C. Wheelock. (2008). Stable prices, stable economy: keeping inflation in check must be No. 1 goal of monetary policymakers. The Regional Economist. 4–9.7 indexed citations
9.
Poole, William. (2008). Financial innovation: engine of growth or source of instability?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
10.
Poole, William. (2008). Bailing out the markets is not a goal of Fed policy. The Regional Economist. 1–3.1 indexed citations
Garrett, Thomas A. & William Poole. (2006). Stop paying more for less: ways to boost productivity in higher education. The Regional Economist. 4–9.5 indexed citations
13.
Poole, William. (2006). RESPONDING TO FINANCIAL CRISES: WHAT ROLE FOR THE FED?. Cato Journal. 27(2). 149–155.2 indexed citations
14.
Poole, William. (2005). The Origins of Francis Goodwin's "The Man in the Moone (1638). Philological quarterly. 84(2). 189–210.1 indexed citations
15.
Poole, William & David C. Wheelock. (2005). The real population problem: too few working, too many retired. The Regional Economist. 4–9.1 indexed citations
16.
Poole, William & Howard J. Wall. (2000). Price stability and the rising tide: how low inflation lifts all ships. The Regional Economist. 4–9.4 indexed citations
17.
Poole, William. (1978). Money and the economy : a monetarist view. Swarthmore College Works (Swarthmore College Libraries).18 indexed citations
18.
Poole, William. (1978). Using T-bill futures to gauge interest rate expectations. Econometric Reviews. 7–19.34 indexed citations
19.
Poole, William. (1976). Indexing and the Capital Markets. American Economic Review. 66(2). 200–204.2 indexed citations
20.
Poole, William, et al.. (1973). The Friedman-Meiselman CMC Paper: New Evidence on an Old Controversy. American Economic Review. 63(5). 908–917.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.