Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation
2006976 citationsMaría J. Nieto, Lluis SantamaríaTechnovationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by María J. Nieto
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of María J. Nieto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María J. Nieto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María J. Nieto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María J. Nieto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María J. Nieto. The network helps show where María J. Nieto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of María J. Nieto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María J. Nieto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María J. Nieto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with María J. Nieto. María J. Nieto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Garcia, Gillian, Rosa M. Lastra, & María J. Nieto. (2009). Bankruptcy and reorganisation procedures for cross-border banks in the EU: Towards an integrated approach to the reform of the EU safety net. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.7 indexed citations
10.
Santamaría, Lluis, María J. Nieto, & Andrés Barge‐Gil. (2009). ¿Hay innovación más allá de la I+D? El papel de otras actividades innovadoras. Universia business review. 2(22). 102–117.3 indexed citations
11.
Ayadi, Rym, et al.. (2008). Basel II implementation in the midst of turbulence : CEPS task force report June 2008.1 indexed citations
12.
Nieto, María J. & Garry J. Schinasi. (2008). Towards an EU Framework for Safeguarding Financial Stability. Econstor (Econstor). 6(3). 27–36.3 indexed citations
13.
Nieto, María J., et al.. (2008). Un análisis de los determinantes de las adquisiciones bancarias en la Unión Europea. Boletín económico - Banco de España. 101–111.3 indexed citations
14.
Nieto, María J. & Larry D. Wall. (2007). Preconditions for a successful implementation of supervisors' prompt corrective action: is there a case for a banking standard in the EU?. Documentos de trabajo del Banco de España. 9–37.23 indexed citations
Nieto, María J., et al.. (2004). Perspectivas de rentabilidad de la banca por Internet en Europa. 173–188.3 indexed citations
19.
Nieto, María J.. (1996). Central and eastern European financial systems: towards integration in the European Union. Documentos de trabajo del Banco de España. 1–58.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.