Subjectivity

340 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 340 papers published in Subjectivity in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Subjectivity usually cover Sociology and Political Science (157 papers), Clinical Psychology (77 papers) and Cultural Studies (74 papers) specifically the topics of Exploration of Posthumanist Performativity in Social Sciences (65 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (39 papers) and Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Subjectivity are Engin F. Isin, Margaret Wetherell, Rosalind Gill, Adele E. Clarke, Michelle Murphy, Vincanne Adams, Sam Binkley, Isabelle Stengers, Annemarie Mol and Thomas J. Csordas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Subjectivity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Subjectivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Subjectivity.

Countries where authors publish in Subjectivity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Subjectivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Subjectivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Subjectivity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025