Cross-Cultural Research

587 papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 587 papers published in Cross-Cultural Research in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cross-Cultural Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (270 papers), Social Psychology (261 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (123 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Differences and Values (182 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (89 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cross-Cultural Research are Harry C. Triandis, Geert Hofstede, Robert R. McCrae, Nigel Barber, Ronald P. Rohner, Theodore M. Singelis, Dharm P. S. Bhawuk, Michele J. Gelfand, Murray A. Straus and Michael Minkov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cross-Cultural Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cross-Cultural Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cross-Cultural Research.

Countries where authors publish in Cross-Cultural Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cross-Cultural Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cross-Cultural Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cross-Cultural Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025