Anthropological Theory

563 papers and 10.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 563 papers published in Anthropological Theory in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropological Theory usually cover Sociology and Political Science (305 papers), Anthropology (245 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (142 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (221 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (63 papers) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropological Theory are Jarrett Zigon, Cris Shore, Henrik Vigh, Timothy R. Paüketat, Ghassan Hage, Yael Navaro‐Yashin, Sherry B. Ortner, C. Jason Throop, John R. Searle and Didier Fassin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anthropological Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropological Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropological Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropological Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropological Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropological Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropological Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025