Global Business Review

1.7k papers and 17.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Global Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Business Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (532 papers), Strategy and Management (472 papers) and Accounting (383 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (241 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (153 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Business Review are Deepak Chawla, Muhammad Shahbaz, Biplab Datta, Anil K. Sharma, Rabindra Kumar Pradhan, Himanshu Joshi, Satish Kumar, Kabiru Maitama Kura, Amit Shankar and Mukesh Kumar Barua.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Business Review.

Countries where authors publish in Global Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Business Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025