Revista Tempo e Argumento

333 papers and 414 indexed citations i.

About

The 333 papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento in the last decades have received a total of 414 indexed citations. Papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento usually cover Sociology and Political Science (210 papers), History (61 papers) and Urban Studies (43 papers) specifically the topics of Brazilian Military Dictatorship and Cultural Resistance (89 papers), Youth, Politics, and Society (33 papers) and History of Education Research in Brazil (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista Tempo e Argumento are Cosme Jesús Gómez Carrasco, Bruce A. VanSledright, Carlos Fico, Robert Parkes, François Dosse, Márcio Seligmann-Silva, Marco Armiero, Zephyr Frank, Céli Regina Jardim Pinto and David King Dunaway.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento.

Countries where authors publish in Revista Tempo e Argumento

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista Tempo e Argumento. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista Tempo e Argumento with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista Tempo e Argumento more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025