Open Library of Humanities

236 papers and 477 indexed citations i.

About

The 236 papers published in Open Library of Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 477 indexed citations. Papers published in Open Library of Humanities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (78 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (58 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (37 papers) specifically the topics of Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (17 papers), Digital Games and Media (15 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Open Library of Humanities are Ευγενία Σιαπέρα, Malory Nye, Richard Hall, Martin Paul Eve, Thomas Apperley, Mike Neary, Joss Winn, Christina Scharff, Elizabeth Poole and Justin Cruickshank.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Open Library of Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Open Library of Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Open Library of Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Open Library of Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Open Library of Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Open Library of Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Open Library of Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025