OAH Magazine of History

599 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 599 papers published in OAH Magazine of History in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in OAH Magazine of History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (267 papers), Political Science and International Relations (100 papers) and History (72 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (112 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (70 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in OAH Magazine of History are Ken Haycock, W. J. Rorabaugh, James Earl Davis, Richard K. Scotch, John McNeill, Anne Henderson, David J. Weber, Suzanne M. Sinke, Kevin Gaines and Gerard B. Nash.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in OAH Magazine of History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in OAH Magazine of History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in OAH Magazine of History.

Countries where authors publish in OAH Magazine of History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in OAH Magazine of History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in OAH Magazine of History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OAH Magazine of History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025