Research Studies in Music Education

505 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 505 papers published in Research Studies in Music Education in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Research Studies in Music Education usually cover Music (463 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (250 papers) and Education (203 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Music Education Insights (458 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (243 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research Studies in Music Education are D. Jean Clandinin, Liora Bresler, Gary E. McPherson, Tom Barone, Kathryn Marsh, Graham Welch, Margaret S. Barrett, Patricia Shehan Campbell, Susan Hallam and Sidsel Karlsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research Studies in Music Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research Studies in Music Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research Studies in Music Education.

Countries where authors publish in Research Studies in Music Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research Studies in Music Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research Studies in Music Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Studies in Music Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025