Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Epidemiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders in Adults in the Community in England
2011643 citationsTraolach Brugha, Sally McManus et al.profile →
Adult psychiatric morbidity in England, 2007: Results of a household survey
2009612 citationsSally McManus, Howard Meltzer et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Jenkins
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Jenkins more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Jenkins. The network helps show where Rachel Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Jenkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Jenkins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Jenkins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Jenkins. Rachel Jenkins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jenkins, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Health, mental health and housing conditions in England. Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey).16 indexed citations
Jenkins, Rachel, Stuart Lancashire, David McDaid, et al.. (2007). Mental Health Reform in Russia –an integrated approach to achieve social inclusion and recovery. Bulletin of the World Health Organization.1 indexed citations
Bebbington, Paul, Herbert Y. Meltzer, Traolach Brugha, et al.. (2003). Unequal access and unmet need: neurotic disorders and the use of primary care services (Reprinted from Psychological Medicine, vol 30, pgs 1359-1367, 2000). UCL Discovery (University College London).
9.
Meltzer, Howard, Paul Bebbington, Traolach Brugha, et al.. (2003). The reluctance to seek treatment for neurotic disorders (Reprinted from Journal of Mental Health, vol 9, pgs 319-327, 2000). UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Jenkins, Rachel, et al.. (1996). Validation of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in British general practice. UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
Jenkins, Rachel. (1994). The prevention of suicide : a conference organised by the Department of Health, Faculty of Public Health Medicine, Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Psychiatrists. HMSO eBooks.10 indexed citations
18.
Charlton, J. C., Sarah Kelly, Karen Dunnell, Barry Evans, & Rachel Jenkins. (1993). Suicide deaths in England and Wales: trends in factors associated with suicide deaths..109 indexed citations
19.
Charlton, J. C., et al.. (1992). Trends in suicide deaths in England and Wales..108 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.