Countries where authors publish in Conservation Genetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Genetics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Conservation Genetics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Genetics.
About Conservation Genetics
The 2.9k papers published in Conservation Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 69.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Conservation Genetics usually cover Genetics (2.3k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (758 papers), Ecology (1.2k papers), Ecological Modeling (191 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (641 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (2.1k papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (647 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (619 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (487 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (357 papers), Plant and animal studies (322 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (264 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (191 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Genetics are Shawn R. Narum, Steven T. Kalinowski, Robin S. Waples, Hongwen Huang, Ming Kang, Xiaohong Yao, Pan Li, Richard Frankham, Cameron R. Turner and Matthew A. Barnes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.