Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Mónica Das Gupta
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mónica Das Gupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mónica Das Gupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mónica Das Gupta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mónica Das Gupta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mónica Das Gupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mónica Das Gupta. The network helps show where Mónica Das Gupta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mónica Das Gupta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mónica Das Gupta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mónica Das Gupta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mónica Das Gupta. Mónica Das Gupta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gupta, Mónica Das, et al.. (2021). Overview and Growth of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in Punjab. Academy of Entrepreneurship journal. 27.
2.
Buvinić, Mayra, et al.. (2013). Violent Conflict and Gender Inequality. The World Bank Research Observer.2 indexed citations
Gupta, Mónica Das, John Bongaarts, & John G.F. Cleland. (2011). Population, poverty, and sustainable development : a review of the evidence. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
5.
Gostin, Lawrence O., et al.. (2010). Implementing Public Health Regulations in Developing Countries: Lessons from the OECD Countries. eYLS (Yale Law School).3 indexed citations
Gragnolati, Michele, et al.. (2006). India's Undernourished Children : A Call for Reform and Action. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.142 indexed citations
12.
Gragnolati, Michele, et al.. (2006). India's Undernourished Children. The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank).57 indexed citations
13.
Gupta, Mónica Das, et al.. (2003). Why is Son Preference so Persistent in East and South Asia? A Cross-Country Study of China, India, and the Republic of Korea. SSRN Electronic Journal.18 indexed citations
14.
Kanbur, Ravi, Christina Malmberg Calvo, Mónica Das Gupta, et al.. (2001). Relatorio sobre o desenvolvimento mundial 2000/2001 : luta contra a pobreza. 1–324.
Gupta, Mónica Das. (1999). Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite: Exploring the Role of Governance in Fertility Decline. SSRN Electronic Journal.
17.
Martine, George, et al.. (1998). Reproductive change in India and Brazil. Oxford University Press eBooks.22 indexed citations
18.
Gupta, Mónica Das, et al.. (1996). Health, poverty and development in India.. Oxford University Press eBooks.30 indexed citations
19.
Gupta, Mónica Das, et al.. (1995). Women's health in India : risk and vulnerability. Oxford University Press eBooks.81 indexed citations
20.
Gupta, Mónica Das. (1981). Population trends and changes in village organization : Rampur revisited. Supplied by the British Library Document Supply Centre eBooks.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.