Organizational Psychology Review

219 papers and 7.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 219 papers published in Organizational Psychology Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Organizational Psychology Review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (117 papers), Social Psychology (106 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (78 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (92 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (50 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Organizational Psychology Review are Deborah E. Rupp, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Steve W. J. Kozlowski, Christopher M. Barnes, Sabine Sonnentag, Jason D. Shaw, Ellen Ernst Kossek, Brenda A. Lautsch, Daan van Knippenberg and Leslie A. DeChurch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Organizational Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Organizational Psychology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organizational Psychology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Organizational Psychology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organizational Psychology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organizational Psychology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizational Psychology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025