Operations Management Research

481 papers and 8.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 481 papers published in Operations Management Research in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Operations Management Research usually cover Strategy and Management (297 papers), Management Information Systems (231 papers) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (85 papers) specifically the topics of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (179 papers), Quality and Supply Management (164 papers) and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Operations Management Research are Andy Neely, Dong‐Young Kim, Alison Ashby, Zhang Yu, Sunil Luthra, Dmitry Ivanov, Anil Kumar, Danny Samson, Taewon Hwang and Donghyun Choi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Operations Management Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Operations Management Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Operations Management Research.

Countries where authors publish in Operations Management Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Operations Management Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Operations Management Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Operations Management Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025