Neurosignals

690 papers and 32.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 690 papers published in Neurosignals in the last decades have received a total of 32.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurosignals usually cover Molecular Biology (295 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (228 papers) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (137 papers) specifically the topics of Circadian rhythm and melatonin (105 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (97 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurosignals are Ilaria Mengoni, Emiliano Peña‐Altamira, Elisabetta Polazzi, Marco Caprini, Ewelina Kurtys, Barbara Monti, Paul J. Meakin, Kenneth R. Watterson, Michael L.J. Ashford and D. Lee Hamilton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurosignals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurosignals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurosignals.

Countries where authors publish in Neurosignals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurosignals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurosignals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurosignals more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025