Countries where authors publish in Current Neurovascular Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Neurovascular Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Neurovascular Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Neurovascular Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Current Neurovascular Research
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Neurovascular Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Neurovascular Research.
About Current Neurovascular Research
The 952 papers published in Current Neurovascular Research in the last decades have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Neurovascular Research usually cover Neurology (204 papers), Neurology (207 papers) and Developmental Neuroscience (47 papers) specifically the topics of Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (142 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (100 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Neurovascular Research are Kenneth Maiese, Zhao Zhong Chong, Yan Shang, Faqi Li, Shaohui Wang, Jinling Hou, Tak Yee Aw, Yan Shang, Christian Humpel and Erjun Ling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.