Neurodegenerative Diseases

839 papers and 31.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 839 papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases in the last decades have received a total of 31.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases usually cover Physiology (345 papers), Neurology (320 papers) and Molecular Biology (264 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (320 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (201 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurodegenerative Diseases are Dave Morgan, Jeffy P. Jimenez, Marcia N. Gordon, Gabriela Peña, Maj-Linda B. Selenica, Chad A. Dickey, Daniel C. Lee, Milene L. Brownlow, K. A. Jellinger and Jack C. de la Torre.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Countries where authors publish in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurodegenerative Diseases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurodegenerative Diseases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurodegenerative Diseases more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025