Modern Asian Studies

2.0k papers and 14.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Modern Asian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Asian Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Political Science and International Relations (889 papers) and Anthropology (514 papers) specifically the topics of South Asian Studies and Conflicts (318 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (303 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (290 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Asian Studies are Sanjay Subrahmanyam, David Washbrook, Rosalind O’Hanlon, Francis Robinson, Ronald Inden, C. A. Bayly, David Mosse, Victor Lieberman, Mick Moore and Tania Murray Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Asian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Asian Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Asian Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025