Rosalind O’Hanlon
- Anthropology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Religious studies top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Topics
- Anthropological Studies and Insights (14 papers)South Asian Studies and Conflicts (9 papers)Islamic Studies and History (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Rosalind O’Hanlon
31 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Anthropology 368
- Sociology and Political Science 302
- Political Science and International Relations 272
- Religious studies 139
- Philosophy 126
Countries citing papers authored by Rosalind O’Hanlon
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosalind O’Hanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosalind O’Hanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosalind O’Hanlon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosalind O’Hanlon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosalind O’Hanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosalind O’Hanlon. The network helps show where Rosalind O’Hanlon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosalind O’Hanlon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosalind O’Hanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosalind O’Hanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosalind O’Hanlon. Rosalind O’Hanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Religious Cultures in Early Modern India: New Perspectives | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | At the Edges of Empire: Essays in the Social and Intellectual History of India | 2 |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | A Comparison Between Women and Men: Tarabai Shinde and the critique of gender relations in colonial India | 18 |
| 18 | 115 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Rosalind O’Hanlon
Rosalind O’Hanlon is a scholar working on Anthropology, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 32 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (14 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (9 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (368 citations), Religious studies (139 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (272 citations). Rosalind O’Hanlon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Washbrook, Csaba Kiss, André Béteille and Richard Williams. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs and Comparative Studies in Society and History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.