Cognitive Linguistics

621 papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 621 papers published in Cognitive Linguistics in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Linguistics usually cover Language and Linguistics (409 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (355 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (121 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (305 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (236 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (146 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Linguistics are Ronald W. Langacker, Rachel Giora, Adele Ε. Goldberg, Michael Tomasello, Holger Diessel, George Lakoff, William Croft, Ewa Dąbrowska, Zoltán Kövecses and John W. Du Bois.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Linguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Linguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Linguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Linguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Linguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Linguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Linguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025