World Journal of Orthopedics

1.0k papers and 17.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics in the last decades have received a total of 17.8k indexed citations. Papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics usually cover Surgery (749 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (208 papers) and Epidemiology (181 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (207 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (199 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Journal of Orthopedics are Joaquín Moya-Angeler, Egemen Ayhan, Pedro Carpintero, Ashraf S. Gorgey, Pavel Kotlarsky, Thomas Mabey, Giuseppe Musumeci, James D. Wylie, Simon Mordecai and Manit Arora.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics.

Countries where authors publish in World Journal of Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Journal of Orthopedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Journal of Orthopedics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025