Asian Review of Accounting

538 papers and 6.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 538 papers published in Asian Review of Accounting in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Review of Accounting usually cover Accounting (449 papers), Strategy and Management (200 papers) and Management Information Systems (104 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (343 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (253 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Review of Accounting are Malcolm Smith, M. Akhtaruddin, Hasnah Haron, Beverley Jackling, Norman Mohd Saleh, Takiah Mohd Iskandar, Mohd Mohid Rahmat, Rusmin Rusmin, Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail and Salim Darmadi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Review of Accounting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Review of Accounting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Review of Accounting.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Review of Accounting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Review of Accounting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Review of Accounting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Review of Accounting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025