Pacific Accounting Review

514 papers and 6.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 514 papers published in Pacific Accounting Review in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Accounting Review usually cover Accounting (347 papers), Strategy and Management (174 papers) and Management Information Systems (131 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (232 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (176 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Accounting Review are Charl de Villiers, Michael E. Bradbury, Gregory A. Liyanarachchi, Chris van Staden, Jim Psaros, Bobae Choi, Doowon Lee, Yuen Teen Mak, İlhan Dalcı and Kenneth A. Merchant.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Accounting Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Accounting Review.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Accounting Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Accounting Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Accounting Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Accounting Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025