Quality Management Journal

789 papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 789 papers published in Quality Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality Management Journal usually cover Management Information Systems (316 papers), Strategy and Management (192 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (129 papers) specifically the topics of Quality and Supply Management (288 papers), Quality and Management Systems (102 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality Management Journal are James Kohnen, Nicole Radziwill, Jon R. Katzenbach, Douglas K. Smith, James R. Evans, Morgan C. Benton, John R. Latham, Robert E. Cole, Victor R. Prybutok and Lars Witell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality Management Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Quality Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality Management Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025