Management Science Letters

2.6k papers and 17.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Management Science Letters in the last decades have received a total of 17.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Management Science Letters usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (449 papers), Strategy and Management (430 papers) and Accounting (346 papers) specifically the topics of Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (232 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (194 papers) and Organizational and Employee Performance (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Management Science Letters are Shahram Hashemnia, Adnan M. Rawashdeh, Naser Azad, S. M. Ferdous Azam, Asyraf Afthanorhan, Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, Jacquline Tham, Nagwan AlQershi, Arash Riasi and Khairul Anuar Mohd Ali.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Management Science Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Management Science Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Management Science Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Management Science Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Management Science Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Management Science Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Management Science Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025