Cogent Business & Management

2.8k papers and 21.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Cogent Business & Management in the last decades have received a total of 21.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cogent Business & Management usually cover Strategy and Management (868 papers), Accounting (788 papers) and Marketing (616 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (361 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (339 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (299 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cogent Business & Management are Shoeb Ahmad, Muhammad Asrar‐ul‐Haq, Sadia Anwar, Hamood Mohammed Al‐Hattami, Jaime Campos, Tu Le, Bora Ly, John C. Munene, Luc Phan Tan and Hart O. Awa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cogent Business & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cogent Business & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cogent Business & Management.

Countries where authors publish in Cogent Business & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cogent Business & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cogent Business & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cogent Business & Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025