Asian Social Science

3.8k papers and 23.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in Asian Social Science in the last decades have received a total of 23.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Social Science usually cover Sociology and Political Science (848 papers), Education (746 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (402 papers) specifically the topics of Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (199 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (161 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Social Science are Melor Md Yunus, Hadi Farhadi, Hadi Salehi, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Arezoo Aghaei Chadegani, Masood Fooladi, Maryam Farhadi, Kwek Choon Ling, Jacob Cherian and Jolly Jacob.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Social Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Social Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Social Science.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Social Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Social Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Social Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Social Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025